Rediscovering tectonic scientific art

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24220/2318-0919v15n2a3849

Keywords:

Abordagem tectônica, Metodologia analítica, Saber‑fazer, Teoria da tectônica

Abstract

There are many ways to understand architecture, and one of them is through Tectonic Theory. Tectonic Theory arose in Germany in the middle of the nineteenth century, through the writings of Karl Otfried Müller, Karl Bötticher, and Gottfried Semper, and made a comeback in the 1990s with Kenneth Frampton and Gevork Hartoonian. The intention of Tectonic Theory is to narrow the relations between the culture of construc‑tion and architectural discourse, as it considers labor to rescue technique, craftsman‑ship, and tactility — a poetic reference to the tradition of construction as a means of expression. This paper aims to dive into the various facets of this theory, understanding its basic concepts through a method of tectonic analysis here called “tectonic approach”. This method seeks to stimulate a new understanding of the tectonic design process, demystifying the view that it is hard to understand

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Aristóteles de Siqueira Campos Cantalice II, Universidade Católica de Pernambuco

Universidade Catolica de Pernambuco | Centro de Ciencias Tecnologicas | Departamento de Arquitetura e Urbanismo | R. do Principe, 526, Boa Vista, 50050‑900, Recife, PE, Brasil.

References

ALMEIDA, J.C.P. Matéria do projeto. Ideais: puristas e razão técnica na arquitetura contemporânea. 2009. 599 f. Tese (Doutoramento em Arquitectura e Construção) — Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, 2009.

ARENDT, H. A condição humana. 11. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária, 2010.

BOTTICHER, K.G.W. Die Tektonik der Hellenen. Potsdam: Berlag von Ferdinand Riegel, 1852. v.1.

CHERNIKHOV, I. The construction of architectural and machine form. In: COOKE, C. Chernikhov, fantasy and construction. London: Architectural Design Profile, 1984.

COLLINS, P. Concrete: The vision of a new architecture. London: McGillian Books, 2004.

COSTA, J.A.; MELO, A.S. Dicionário da língua portuguesa. 6. ed. Porto: Porto Editora, 2002.

DEPLAZES, A. Constructing architecture: Materials, processes, structures. Boston: Birkhauser, 2005.

FORD, E. The architecture detail. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2011.

FRAMPTON, K. Studies in tectonic culture. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1995.

FRANCASTEL, P. Art and technology in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. New York: Urzone, 2000.

FRASCARI, M. O detalhe narrativo. In: NESBITT, K. Theorizing a new agenda for architecture: An anthology of architectural theory, 1965‑1995. Princeton: Princeton Architectural Press, 1996. p.538‑556.

GIEDION, S. Mechanization takes command. New York: Oxford University Press, 1948.

GIEDION, S. The Eternal present: The beginnings of architecture. London: Oxford University Press, 1964.

GREGOTTI, V. Inside architecture. Massachussetts: MIT Press, 1996a.

GREGOTTI, V. O exercício do detalhe. In: NESBITT, K., (Org.). Theorizing a new agenda for architecture: An anthology of architectural theory, 1965‑1995. Princeton: Princeton Architectural Press, 1996b. p.535‑538.

HARTOONIAN, G. Ontology of construction: On nihilism of technology in theories of modern architecture. Cambridge: University Press, 1994.

HEIDEGGER, M. La pregunta por la tecnica. In: Conferencias y articulos. Barcelona: Ediciones del Serbal, 1994.

HEIDEGGER, M. The Origin of the Work of Art, 1960. In: HEIDEGGER, M. Off the Beaten Track. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

HUBSCH, H. In what style should we build? In: HERRMANN, W. (Org.). In what style should we build? The German debate on architectural style. Santa Monica: Getty Center, 1992.

LEATHERBARROW, D.; MOSTAFAHVI, M. Surface architecture. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002.

LEGAULT, R. L’appareil de l’architecture moderne, In: POTIE, P; SIMONNET, C. (Org.).

Culture constructive. Paris: Editions Parenthesis, 1992. p.53‑68.

MAHFUZ, E. Ensaio sobre a razão compositiva, uma relação do todo com as partes na arquitetura. Belo Horizonte: AP Cultural, 1995.

MARTINHO, F. A pedra está na construção como a construção está na pedra. Revista Nu, n.39, p.4‑7, 2013.

MONEO, R. En los Andes. Revista Circo: La casa del aire, n.148, p.1‑6, 2008.

MORRIS, W. Artes Menores. Lisboa: Antigona, 2003.

MUECKE, M. W. Gottfried Semper in Zurich: An Intersection of Theory and Practice. Ames: Culicidae, 2005.

MULLER, K. O. Ancient art and its remains: or a manual of the archeology of art. London:

A. Fullarton and Co., 1850.

MUMFORD, L. Technics and Civilization. New York: Harcourt, Brace and company, 1934.

MUMFORD, L. Art and technics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1952.

OLEA, C. et al. Diccionario de arquitectura y construccion. Madrid: Editorial Munilla‑Leria, 2001.

OLIVER, P. Dwellings: The vernacular House worldwide. London: Phaidon, 2003.

RUSKIN, J. The seven lamps of architecture. New York: Dover, 1989.

SEKLER, E. Structure, construction, tectonics. In: KEPES, G. (Org.). Structure in Art and in Science. New York: George Brazilier, 1965, p.89‑95.

SEMPER, G. The four elements of architecture. In: MALLGRAVE, H. F.; HERRMANN, W. (Org.). The four elements of architecture and other writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

SENNETT, R. O artifice. Rio de Janeiro: Record, 2009.

Published

2018-07-20

How to Cite

Cantalice II, A. de S. C. (2018). Rediscovering tectonic scientific art. Oculum Ensaios - ISSNe 2318-0919, 15(2), 247–269. https://doi.org/10.24220/2318-0919v15n2a3849