Performance in the divided attention test as a function of people’s age

Authors

  • Fabián Javier Marín RUEDA Universidade São Francisco, Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Psicologia

Keywords:

Divided attention, Psychological test, Test validety

Abstract

Literature points to incremental performance in attention up until young adulthood, followed by significant losses arising from the aging process. In this context, the aim of this research was to ascertain proof of validity based on the age variable for the Divided Attention Test, based on the hypothesis that an increase in age would correspond to a decrease in the ability to divide attention. A total of 878 individuals took part from the states of Bahia and Sergipe and were undergraduates or individuals and that had undergone psychological assessment of drivers. Ages varied from 18 to 72 years old (M=26.74, SD=8.14). Men comprised 51.82% of the total. The instrument was applied collectively in the state of Sergipe, and individually in Bahia. Results showed significant, negative correlation between the Divided Attention Test scores and people’s age. Analysis of variance showed significant differences between ages and, based on this, three age groups were formed that were differentiated by Tukey’s test. Based on the results, it was concluded that there was evidence of validity for the Divided Attention Test based on age difference.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alchieri, J. C., Lunkes, C. L. K., & Zimmer, D. (2002). Toulouse-Piéron: atualizações de resultados para o Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Avaliação Psicológica, 1 (2), 111-118.

Ball, K., & Owsley, C. (2003). Driving competence: it’s not a matter of age. Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 51 (10), 1499-1501.

Bondi, M. W., Chan, A. S., Delis, D. C., Serody, A. B., Eberson- Shumate, S. C., Salmon, D. P., et al. (2002). Cognitive and neuropathologic correlates of stroop color-word test performance in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 16 (3), 335-343.

Brandão, M. L. (1995). Atenção. In M. L. Brandão (Org.), Psicofisiologia (pp.145-154). São Paulo: Atheneu.

Briand, K. A., Hening, W., Poinzner, H., & Sereno, A. B. (2001). Automatic orienting of visuospatial attention in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 39, 1240-1249.

Brickenkamp, R. (2004). d2: test de atención (2nd ed.). Madrid: TEA Ediciones.

Burg, A. (1967). The relationship between vision test scores and driving record: general findings (Report 67-24). Los Angeles: Department of Engineering.

Burg, A. (1968). The relationship between vision test scores and driving record: additional findings (Report 68-27). Los Angeles: Department of Engineering.

Campagne, A., Pebayle, T ., & Muzet, A. (2004). Correlation between driving errors and vigilance level: influence of the driver’s age. Physiological Behaviors, 80 (4), 515-524.

Chan, R. C. K. (1999). Attentional deficits in patients with closed head injury: a further study to the discriminativ validity of the test of evereday attention. Brain Injury, 14 (3), 227-236.

Digirolamo, G. J., & Posner, M. I. (1996). Attention and schizofrenia: a view from cognitive neurosciense. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 1 (2), 95-102.

Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attention networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14 (3), 340-347.

Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., & Mangun, G. R. (2006). Neurociência cognitiva: a biologia da mente. Porto Alegre: Artmed.

Goldberg, T. E., Gold, J. M., & Braff, D. L. (1991). Neuropsychological functioning and time-linked information processing in schizophrenia. Review of Psychiatry, 10, 60-78.

Hawkins, H. L., Kramer, A. F., & Capaldi, D. (1992). Aging, exercise, and attention. Psychology and Aging, 7 (4), 643-653.

Hiltmann, H. (1962). Compedio de los test psico-diagnósticos. Buenos Aires: Kapelusz.

Kallus, K. W, Schmitt, J. A. J., & Benton, D. (2005). Attention, psychomotor functions and age. European Journal Nutrition, 44 (8), 465-484.

Kouststaal, W., Schacter, D. L., & Brenner, C. (2001). Dual task demands and gist-based false recognition of pictures in younger and older adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 44 (3), 399-426.

Lee, H. C., Lee, A. H., & Cameron, D. (2003). Validation of a driving simulator by measuring the visual attention skill of older adult drivers. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57 (3), 324-328.

Lent, R. (2001). Cem bilhões de neuronios: conceitos fundamentais de neurociência. São Paulo: Editora Atheneu.

Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Luria, A. R. (1979). Curso de psicologia geral. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira. Noronha, A. P. P., Sisto, F. F., Rueda, F. J. M., & Bartholomeu,

D. (2008). Evidência de validade desenvolvimental para o teste de atenção dividida. Psico, 39 (4), 492-499.

Oswley, C. (1994). Vision and driving in the elderly. Optometry and Vision Science, 71 (12), 727-735.

Owsley, C., Ball, K., & McGwin Jr., G. (1998). Visual processing impair-ment and risk of motor vehicle crash among older adults. JAMA, 279 (14), 1083-1088.

Papalia, D. E., & Olds, S. W. (2000). Desenvolvimento Humano. São Paulo: Pioneira.

Park, D., & Smith, A.D. (1989). Effects of age and a divided attention tasl presented during encoding and retrieval on memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15 (6), 1185-1191.

Pesce, C., Guidetti, L., Baldari, C., Tessitore, A., & Capranica, L. (2005). Effects of aging on visual attentional focusing. Gerontology, 51 (4), 266-276.

Rueda, F. J. M. (2010). Teste de atenção dividida - TEADI. Itatiba: Universidade São Francisco.

Rueda, F. J. M., & Castro, N. R. (2009). Capacidade atencional: há decréscimo com o passar da idade? Psicologia: Ciências e Profissão, 30 (3). Disponível em <http://pepisic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php>.

Rueda, F. J. M., Noronha, A. P. P., Sisto, F. F., & Bartholomeu, D. (2008). Evidência de validade de construto para o teste de atenção sustentada. Psicologia: Ciência e Profissão, 28 (3), 498-505.

Rueda, F. J. M., & Sisto, F. F. (2009). Evidência de validade de construto pela diferenciação das idades para o TEACO-FF. Psicologia: Ciências e Profissão, 30 (3). Disponível em <http://pepisic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php>.

Sanchez-Gil, I. Y., & Perez-Martinez, V. T. (2008). El funcionamiento cognitivo en la vejez: atención y percepción en el adulto mayor. Revista Cubana de Medicina General Integrada, 24 (2), 1-7.

Sanders, A. F. (1970). Some aspects of the selective process in the functional field of view. Ergonomics, 13 (1), 101-117.

Silva, M. F. G. (1999). Estudo comparativo sobre o desempenho em provas de memória e atenção entre mulheres pré-menstruadas, deprimidas e não deprimidas. Dissertação de mestrado não-publicada, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo.

Sisto, F. F., Noronha, A. P. P., Lamounier, R., Bartholomeu, D., & Rueda, F. J. M. (2006). Testes de atenção dividida e sustentada: manual. São Paulo: Vetor Editora Psicopedagógica.

Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Psicologia cognitiva. Porto Alegre: Artmed.

Tielsch, J. M., Sommer, A., & Witt, K. (1990). The Baltimore eye survey. Blindness and visual impairment in na American urban population. Archives of Ophthalmology, 108 (2), 286-290.

Underwood, G. (2007). Visual attention and the transition from novice to advanced driver. Ergonomics, 50 (8), 1235-1249.

Zillmer, E. A., & Spiers, M. V. (1998). Principles of clinical neuropsychology. Pacific Groove: Brooks/Cole.

Published

2011-06-30

How to Cite

RUEDA, F. J. M. (2011). Performance in the divided attention test as a function of people’s age. Psychological Studies, 28(2). Retrieved from https://seer.sis.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/8881