Understanding the developing subject in the Cultural Psychology of education

Authors

Keywords:

Cultural psychology, Development, Education, Modernity, Subjectivity

Abstract

Cultural psychology of education strives to understand the locality of the developing individual. This article tries to interpret the mission and vision of the cultural psychology of education in the background of modern society, with individualizing and techno-mechanistic social trends as its prominent feature. The concept of “contextualized individual” is proposed as a potential framework to conceptualize the relational and contextual dependence of the developing subject. The article also re-interprets Li and Xu’s 2018 paper “Developmental Psychology Research Based on Educational Practice in China” to explore how to use the framework of the “contextualized individual” to theoretically channel and generalize educational researches and interventional studies in a local educational setting. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Boll, T. (2018). Psychologists and neoliberal school reforms: multi-faceted problems calling for multi-faceted interventions. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 52(3), 425-437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-018-9419-9

Cornejo, C. (2008). Intersubjectivity as co-phenomenology: From the holism of meaning to the being-in-the-world-withothers. Integrative Psychological and Behavioural Science, 42(2), 171-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9043-6

Cornejo, C. (2007). Review essay: the locus of subjectivity in cultural studies. Culture and Psychology, 13(2), 243-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X07076608

Cornejo, C. (2004). Who says what the words say? The problem of linguistic meaning in psychology. Theory and Psychology, 14(1), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354304040196

Gadamer, H. G. (2008). Philosophical Hermeneutics. California: University of California Press.

García-Palacios, M., Shabel, P., Horn, A., & Castorina, J. A. (2018). Uses and meanings of “context” in studies on children’s knowledge: a viewpoint from anthropology and constructivist psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 52(2), 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-018-9414-1

He, M. (2018). Creating play atmosphere and time for children in Chinese kindergarten: difficulties and reflection. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 52(3), 351-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-018-9445-7

Li, X. W. (2009). Integration of psychological researches under the scheme of subjectivity. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 43(4), 301-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-009-9103-1

Li, X. W. (2012). Peer relations. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 2236-2288). Oxford: Oxford University Press Inc.

Li, X. W. (2011). Research on adolescents’ development and school cultural ecology Construction. Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House.

Li, X. W., & Xu, S. S. (2018). Developmental psychology research based on educational practice in China. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 52(3), 341-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-018-9438-6

Lukács, G. (1971). History and class consciousness: studies in marxist dialectics. Cambridge: MIT Press (Original work published in 1968).

Marsico, G., (2017). Jerome S. Bruner: manifesto for the future of education, Infancia y Aprendizaje. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 40(4), 754-781. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2017.1367597

Marsico, G. (2015). Striving for the new: Cultural psychology as a developmental science. Culture and Psychology, 21(4), 445-454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X15623020

Marsico, G. (2018). The challenges of the schooling from cultural psychology of education. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 52(3), 474-489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-018-9454-6

Marsico, G., & Tateo, L. (2018). Introduction: the construct of educational self. In G. Marsico & L. Tateo (Eds.), Emergence of self in educational contexts (pp. 1-14). Cham: Springer.

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1998). The german ideology: including thesis on Feuerbach. Amherst: Prometheus Books.

Tateo, L. (2018). Education as “dilemmatic field”. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 52(3), 388-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-018-9429-7

Tateo, L. (2019). Introduction: the inherent ambivalence of educational trajectories and the zone of proximal development with reduced potential. In L. Tateo, (Ed.), Educational dilemmas: a cultural psychological perspective (pp. 1-21). London: Routledge. ttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781315101095-1

Wang, D. F. (2002). Let historical materialism itself emerge: an ontological approach to the concept of “actual individual”. Journal of Yunnan Uniersity, 1,16-23.

Wang, D. F. (2013). Marx’s method of historical criticism. Philosophical Research, 9, 11-17.

Wu, X. M. (2002). Lukács and criticism of modernity: the analytical orientation of “History and class consciousness” and its ontological basis. Tianjin Social Sciences, 5, 15-19.

Wu, A., & Xu, S. (2020). One step further: where to put the subjectivity of human mind in efforts of integrating psychology? Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 54(3), 597-603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09549-w

Xu, S. (2019). Revisiting Bruner’s legacy from the perspective of historical materialism. Integrative Psychology and Behavioral Science, 53(4), 590-601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-019-09490-7

Published

2022-07-25

How to Cite

XU, S., WU, A., & LI, X. (2022). Understanding the developing subject in the Cultural Psychology of education. Psychological Studies, 39, 1–9. Retrieved from https://seer.sis.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/6477

Issue

Section

DOSSIER | CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION