Building bridges between innovation and regulation:

fundamentals of public policy in the field of intellectual property in the digital age – lessons from Brazil and global experience

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24220/2675-9160v6a2025e16230

Keywords:

Digital age, Innovation, Intellectual property, Public policy, Regulation

Abstract

It analyzes the fundamentals of public policy on intellectual property in the digital age, focusing on Brazil’s experience and comparing it with international practices. It addresses the challenge of balancing innovation and regulation through three pillars: incentives for innovation, legal adaptation to emerging technologies, and ensuring equitable access to knowledge. The study highlights Brazilian patent system reforms and open-access strategies, alongside global examples from the European Union, United States, and China. It concludes by proposing multi stakeholder collaboration, international cooperation, and regulatory sandboxes to harmonize protection and technological progress.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agrawal, A. Intellectual property as a catalyst: promoting inclusiveness, empowerment and development. IP Press, 22 Jan. 2024. Available from: https://www.theippress.com/author/aditi-agrawal/. Cited: 11 May 2025.

Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International. Supreme Court of the United States, 573 U.S. 208. No. 13–298. Argued March 31, 2014 − Decided June 19, 2014. Available from: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/573/208/. Cited: 11 Jun. 2025.

Barton, J. H. Adapting the intellectual property system to new technologies. In: Global dimensions of intellectual property rights in science and technology. [S. l.]: National Academies Press, 1993.

Brasil. Lei nº 12.965, de 23 de abril de 2014. Marco Civil da Internet. Diário Oficial da União: seção 1, Brasília, Imprensa Nacional, 24 abr. 2014. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2014/lei/l12965.htm. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2025

European Union. Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 Apr. 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, L 130/92, 17 May 2019. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj/eng/. Cited: 5 May 2025.

Financial Times. US patent laws need updating for today’s budding industries. Financial Times, 5 Aug. 2024. Available from: https://www.ft.com/content/f7fb9ec2-9cc3-4af3-a10e-3c76a0492e13. Cited: 13 Dec. 2025.

Huang, C.; Cao, C.; Coreynen, W. Stronger and more just? Recent reforms of China’s intellectual property rights system and their implications. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, v. 18, n. 3, p. 210-223, 2023. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-04-2023-0081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-04-2023-0081

Katleho, A. The evolution of intellectual property rights in the digital age. Journal of Modern Law and Policy, v. 4, n. 2, p. 1-14, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47941/jmlp.2158

Loffredi, A. Navigating modern challenges in intellectual property law: balancing innovation, protection and public access. Journal of International Business Research, v. 23, n. 5, p. 1-3, 2024. Available from: https://www.abacademies.org/articles/navigating-modern-challenges-in-intellectual-property-law-balancinginnovation-protection-and-public-access.pdf. Cited: 11 Feb. 2025.

Mane, V. S. Intellectual Property Rights (IPR): their role, challenges, and globalimpact in the digital age. InSight Bulletin: A Multidisciplinary Interlink International Research Journal, v. 1, n. 2, 2024. Available from: https://ibrj.us/. Cited: 13 May 2025.

Menand, L. Is A.I. the Death of I.P.? The New Yorker, 15 Jan. 2024. Available from: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/01/22/who-owns-this-sentence-a-history-of-copyrights-and-wrongs-david-bellosalexandre-montagu-book-review. Cited: 13 May 2025.

Olayanju Jayeola, A. Intellectual property protection in the digital age: an exposition on the impact of AI generated images. SSRN, 13 Jan. 2025. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5019386. Cited: 13 Feb. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5019386

Paugh, R. Artificial intelligence and copyright: navigating the new legal Landscape. Senior Executive Media, 20 Feb. 2025. Available from: https://www.seniorexecutive.com. Cited: 12 May 2025.

Samuelson, P.; Davis, R. The digital dilemma: a perspective on intellectual property in the information age. Berkeley: University of California: MIT, 2000. Available from: https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/9601/the-digital-dilemma-intellectual-property-in-the-information-age. Cited: 13 May 2025.

Wininger, A. China issues the 2025 Intellectual Property Nation Building Promotion Plan to accelerate the construction of a powerful intellectual property country. China IP Law Update, 8 May 2025. Available from: https://natlawreview.com/article/china-issues-2025-intellectual-property-nation-building-promotion-planaccelerate. Cited: 10 Jun. 2025.

Published

2025-12-17

How to Cite

Hogemann, E. R. (2025). Building bridges between innovation and regulation: : fundamentals of public policy in the field of intellectual property in the digital age – lessons from Brazil and global experience. Revista De Direitos Humanos E Desenvolvimento Social, 6. https://doi.org/10.24220/2675-9160v6a2025e16230

Issue

Section

Originais