Two approaches to evaluate perception about food
Palabras clave:
Fast foods, NOVA classification, Ranking test, Sorting task, Ultra-processed foodResumen
Objective
The aims of this research were to investigate the perception about foods in Brazil through two studies: 1) to investigate the perception about the NOVA classification of foods; and 2) to investigate the perception regarding the caloric value of fast foods and restaurant meals.
Methods
The two studies were carried out online using Google Forms. In study 1 (n=156), participants received twenty-five food concepts and were asked to associate each one with one of the five categories: unprocessed, minimally processed, culinary ingredients, processed and ultraprocessed. In study 2 (n=184), images of eight meals (four of fast foods and four of restaurant meals) were provided and participants were asked to group them, as they deemed necessary, depending on the caloric value that each meal provided. After that, the individuals were asked to rank the previously formed groups from the most caloric to the least caloric.
Results
Participants perceived which foods are unprocessed and ultra-processed, as proposed by NOVA classification, although there was some confusion and misunderstanding about some foods, such as powdered milk, and the culinary ingredients group. Moreover, participants did not perceive the real caloric values of fast-food meals nor restaurant meals. Meals were ranked differently from their real caloric value and participants thought, in general, that fast foods are more caloric than restaurant meals.
Conclusion
The studies showed that Brazilians have difficulties in perceiving information about foods, i.e., to reach the population regarding food is neither simple nor trivial, highlighting the need to educate the population about it.
Citas
World Health Organization. Noncommunicable diseases. WHO; 2022 [cited 2023 Apr 5]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases
Borges LPSL, Santana NL, Costa THM. Adherence to National Food Guide Recommendations: Can it slow the obesity epidemic? A systematic review. Curr Nutr Rep. 2020;9:316-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13668-020-00339-9
Brasil. Guia alimentar para a população brasileira: Promovendo a alimentação saudável. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2008.
Brasil. Guia alimentar para a população brasileira. 2nd ed. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2014.
Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Lawrence M, Louzada MLC, Machado PP. Ultra-processed foods, diet quality, and health using the NOVA classification system. Rome: FAO; 2019.
Petrus RR, Sobral PJA, Tadini CC, Gonçalves CB. The NOVA classification system: A critical perspective in food science. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2021;116:603-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.08.010
Menegassi B, Sato PM, Scagliusi FB, Moubarac JC. Comparing the ways a sample of Brazilian adults classify food with the NOVA food classification: An exploratory insight. Appetite. 2019;137:226-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.03.010
Menegassi B, Scagliusi FB, Nardocci M, Moubarac JC. Knowledge of the NOVA food classification in a sample of Brazilian adults. Rev Chil Nutr. 2020;47(6):950-9. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-75182020000600950
Aguirre A, Borneo MT, El Khori S, Borneo R. Exploring the understanding of the term “ultra-processed foods” by young consumers. Food Res Int. 2019;115:535-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.09.059
Ares G, Vidal L, Allegue G, Giménez A, Bandeira E, Moratorio X, et al. Consumers’ conceptualization of ultra-processed foods. Appetite. 2016;105:611-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.06.028
Menegassi B, Almeida JB, Olimpio MYM, Brunharo MSM, Langa FR. The new food classification: Theory, practice and difficulties. Cien Saúde Colet. 2018;23(12):4165-75. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320182312.30872016
Roberts SB, Das SK, Suen VMM, Pihlajamäki J, Kuriyan R, Steiner-Asiedu M, et al. Measured energy content of frequently purchased restaurant meals: Multi-country cross sectional study. Brit Med J. 2018;363:k4864. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k4864
IBGE. Censo demográfico 2010: Características da população e dos domicílios. Resultados do universo. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2011.
IBGE. Pesquisa de orçamentos familiares 2008–2009: Análise do consumo alimentar pessoal no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2011.
Patroni Pizza. Tabela nutricional. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 15]. Available from: https://www.patronipizza.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/TABELA-NUTRICIONAL_CARDAPIO-PATRONI-CLASSIC_ 35-ANOS.pdf
Habib’s. Tabela nutricional: Maio 2020. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 15]. Available from: https://www.habibs.com.br/storage/pdf/tb_nutri.pdf
Montana Grill. Tabela nutricional. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 15]. Available from: http://www.montanagrill.com.br/cardapio#executivos
Pizza Hut. Tabela nutricional. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 15]. Available from: http://www.pizzahut-ab.com.br/application/content/tabela-nutricional.pdf
McDonald’s. Tabela nutricional. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 15]. Available from: https://www.mcdonalds.com.br/cardapio/linha-signature/duplo-picanha
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Ana Carolina Conti, Ana Laura Fermoselli Moreira, Breno Silva Lamana, Luana Rachel Salgueiro Marani, Liara Silva Dias-Faceto

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.