Two approaches to evaluate perception about food

Autores/as

  • Ana Carolina Conti Universidade Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas, Departamento de Engenharia e Tecnologia de Alimentos. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8139-9687
  • Ana Laura Fermoselli Moreira Universidade Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas, Departamento de Engenharia e Tecnologia de Alimentos. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0046-0595
  • Breno Silva Lamana Universidade Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas, Departamento de Engenharia e Tecnologia de Alimentos. https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1945-0996
  • Luana Rachel Salgueiro Marani Universidade Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas, Departamento de Engenharia e Tecnologia de Alimentos. https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7287-1036
  • Liara Silva Dias-Faceto Universidade Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas, Departamento de Engenharia e Tecnologia de Alimentos. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9310-4498

Palabras clave:

Fast foods, NOVA classification, Ranking test, Sorting task, Ultra-processed food

Resumen

Objective
The aims of this research were to investigate the perception about foods in Brazil through two studies: 1) to investigate the perception about the NOVA classification of foods; and 2) to investigate the perception regarding the caloric value of fast foods and restaurant meals.
Methods
The two studies were carried out online using Google Forms. In study 1 (n=156), participants received twenty-five food concepts and were asked to associate each one with one of the five categories: unprocessed, minimally processed, culinary ingredients, processed and ultraprocessed. In study 2 (n=184), images of eight meals (four of fast foods and four of restaurant meals) were provided and participants were asked to group them, as they deemed necessary, depending on the caloric value that each meal provided. After that, the individuals were asked to rank the previously formed groups from the most caloric to the least caloric.
Results
Participants perceived which foods are unprocessed and ultra-processed, as proposed by NOVA classification, although there was some confusion and misunderstanding about some foods, such as powdered milk, and the culinary ingredients group. Moreover, participants did not perceive the real caloric values of fast-food meals nor restaurant meals. Meals were ranked differently from their real caloric value and participants thought, in general, that fast foods are more caloric than restaurant meals.
Conclusion
The studies showed that Brazilians have difficulties in perceiving information about foods, i.e., to reach the population regarding food is neither simple nor trivial, highlighting the need to educate the population about it.

Citas

World Health Organization. Noncommunicable diseases. WHO; 2022 [cited 2023 Apr 5]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases

Borges LPSL, Santana NL, Costa THM. Adherence to National Food Guide Recommendations: Can it slow the obesity epidemic? A systematic review. Curr Nutr Rep. 2020;9:316-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13668-020-00339-9

Brasil. Guia alimentar para a população brasileira: Promovendo a alimentação saudável. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2008.

Brasil. Guia alimentar para a população brasileira. 2nd ed. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2014.

Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Lawrence M, Louzada MLC, Machado PP. Ultra-processed foods, diet quality, and health using the NOVA classification system. Rome: FAO; 2019.

Petrus RR, Sobral PJA, Tadini CC, Gonçalves CB. The NOVA classification system: A critical perspective in food science. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2021;116:603-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.08.010

Menegassi B, Sato PM, Scagliusi FB, Moubarac JC. Comparing the ways a sample of Brazilian adults classify food with the NOVA food classification: An exploratory insight. Appetite. 2019;137:226-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.03.010

Menegassi B, Scagliusi FB, Nardocci M, Moubarac JC. Knowledge of the NOVA food classification in a sample of Brazilian adults. Rev Chil Nutr. 2020;47(6):950-9. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-75182020000600950

Aguirre A, Borneo MT, El Khori S, Borneo R. Exploring the understanding of the term “ultra-processed foods” by young consumers. Food Res Int. 2019;115:535-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.09.059

Ares G, Vidal L, Allegue G, Giménez A, Bandeira E, Moratorio X, et al. Consumers’ conceptualization of ultra-processed foods. Appetite. 2016;105:611-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.06.028

Menegassi B, Almeida JB, Olimpio MYM, Brunharo MSM, Langa FR. The new food classification: Theory, practice and difficulties. Cien Saúde Colet. 2018;23(12):4165-75. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320182312.30872016

Roberts SB, Das SK, Suen VMM, Pihlajamäki J, Kuriyan R, Steiner-Asiedu M, et al. Measured energy content of frequently purchased restaurant meals: Multi-country cross sectional study. Brit Med J. 2018;363:k4864. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k4864

IBGE. Censo demográfico 2010: Características da população e dos domicílios. Resultados do universo. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2011.

IBGE. Pesquisa de orçamentos familiares 2008–2009: Análise do consumo alimentar pessoal no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2011.

Patroni Pizza. Tabela nutricional. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 15]. Available from: https://www.patronipizza.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/TABELA-NUTRICIONAL_CARDAPIO-PATRONI-CLASSIC_ 35-ANOS.pdf

Habib’s. Tabela nutricional: Maio 2020. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 15]. Available from: https://www.habibs.com.br/storage/pdf/tb_nutri.pdf

Montana Grill. Tabela nutricional. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 15]. Available from: http://www.montanagrill.com.br/cardapio#executivos

Pizza Hut. Tabela nutricional. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 15]. Available from: http://www.pizzahut-ab.com.br/application/content/tabela-nutricional.pdf

McDonald’s. Tabela nutricional. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 15]. Available from: https://www.mcdonalds.com.br/cardapio/linha-signature/duplo-picanha

Descargas

Publicado

2025-06-11

Cómo citar

Conti, A. C., Moreira, A. L. F., Lamana, B. S., Marani, L. R. S., & Dias-Faceto, L. S. (2025). Two approaches to evaluate perception about food. Revista De Nutrição, 37. Recuperado a partir de https://seer.sis.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/16169

Número

Sección

EDUCAÇÃO ALIMENTAR E NUTRICIONAL | THEME SECTION: FOOD AND NUTRITION EDUCATION