Preferences for menu labelling formats of young adults in Brazil and in the United Kingdom

Authors

  • Renata Carvalho de OLIVEIRA Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
  • Ana Carolina FERNANDES Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
  • Rossana Pacheco da Costa PROENÇA Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
  • Heather HARTWELL Bournemouth University
  • Vanessa Mello RODRIGUES Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
  • Giovanna Medeiros Rataichesck FIATES Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Keywords:

Feeding behavior, Focus group, Nutritional focts, Qualitative research, Restaurants

Abstract

Objective
This pilot study was aimed at exploring preferences of young adults in two different contexts on restaurant menu labelling formats.

Methods
Five focus groups were conducted with 36 participants, two focus groups with 11 participants in Brazil and three focus groups with 25 in the United Kingdom. Themes originating from the content analysis of the transcriptions were organised around four possible menu labelling formats: 1) numerical information on calories; 2) numerical information on calories and nutrients; 3) traffic light system plus Guideline Daily Amounts; 4) food information with ingredients list plus highlighted symbols.

Results
In both countries, participants preferred the ingredients list plus symbols format, considered more comprehensive and useful to make an informed food choice. Organic food and vegetarian symbols were the ones considered most important to appear on restaurant menu labels with ingredients list. However, most participants in Brazil and in the United Kingdom rejected the information restricted to calories and calories plus nutrients formats, saying that these would not influence their own choices.

Conclusion
This is the first multicultural qualitative study exploring preferences of people living in different countries with different eating habits, but where menu labelling is voluntary. Results evidenced similarities in participants’ likes and dislikes for menu labelling formats in these two different contexts. Discussions showed participants in both countries prefer qualitative information than numerical information, suggesting that ingredients list and symbols provide information that people want to see on the menu.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bezerra IN, Sichieri R. Eating out of home and obesity: A Brazilian nationwide survey. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12(11):2037-43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980009005710

Naska A, Orfanos P, Trichopoulou A, May AM, Overvad K, Jakobsen UM, et al. Eating out, weight and weight gain. A cross-sectional and prospective analysis in the context of the EPICPANACEA study. Int J Obes. 2011;35(3):416-26.

Bleich SN, Pollack KM. The publics’ understanding of daily caloric recommendations and their perceptions of calorie posting in chain restaurants. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:121. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-121

Malik VS, Willet WC, Hu FB. Global obesity: Trends, risk factors and policy implications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2013;9(1):13-27. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2012.199

United States of America. Patient protection and affordable car act. Section 4205: Nutrition labeling of standard menu items at chain restaurants. 2014 [cited 2015 Sept 11]. Available from: http://docs.house.gov

Ministério da Saúde (Brasil). PNAN: Política Nacional de Alimentação e Nutrição. Brasília: Editora do Brasil; 2013.

Department of Health (United Kingdom). Public health responsibility deal: Sign up and pledge to improve public health in England. London: Departament of Health; 2012 [cited 2015 Oct 1]. Available from: http://responsibilitydeal.dh.gov.uk

Heathcote F, Baic S. The effectiveness and acceptability of a traffic light labelled menu with energy information to signpost customers towards healthier alternatives in a table service restaurant. J Human Nutr Diet. 2011;24(4):375-407. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-277X.2011.01177_21.x

Gerlach L. The effect of displaying traffic-light nutritional labels in a university cafeteria on students’ food choice. Plymouth Stud J Health Soc Work. 2013;5:13-29.

Feldman C, Hartwell H, Brusca J. Using student opinion and design inputs to develop an informed university foodservice menu. Appetite. 2013;69:80-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013.05.009

Kiszko KM, Martinez OD, Abrams C, Elbel B. The influence of calorie labeling on food orders and consumption: A review of the literature. J Commun Health. 2014;39(6):1248-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-014-9876-0

Long MW, Tobias DK, Cradock AL, Batchelder H, Gortmaker SL. Systematic review and meta-analysisof the impact of restaurant menu calorie labeling. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(5):e11-e24. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302570

Sinclair S, Cooper M, Mansfield ED. The influence of menu labeling on calories selected or consumed: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114(9):1375-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2014.05.014

Swartz JJ, Braxton D, Viera A J. Calorie menu labeling on quick-service restaurant menus: An updated systematic review of the literature. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activ. 2011;8:135. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-135

Gatley A, Caraher M, Lang T. A qualitative cross cultural examination of attitudes and behaviour in relation to cooking habits in France and Britain. Appetite. 2014;75(1):71-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013.12.014

Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Resolução RDC nº 360, de 23 de dezembro de 2003. Aprova regulamento técnico sobre rotulagem nutricional de alimentos embalados, tornando obrigatória a rotulagem nutricional. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil. 2003.

European Communities. Regulation (EU) nº 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, amending Regulations (EC) nº 1924/2006 and (EC) nº 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Commission Directive 87/250/EEC, Council Directive 90/496/EEC, Commission Directive 1999/10/EC, Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Directives 2002/67/EC and 2008/5/EC and Commission Regulation (EC) nº 608/2004. Official J Eur Union. 2011;304(62):18-63.

Bardin L. Análise de conteúdo. 4ª ed. Lisboa: Edições (70); 2010.

Lando AM, Labiner-Wolfe J. Helping consumers make more healthful food choices. Consumer views on modifying food labels and providing point-of purchase nutrition information at quick-service restaurants. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007;39(3):157-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb. 2006.12.010

Morley B, Scully M, Martin J, Niven P, Dixon H, Wakefield M. What types of nutrition menu labelling lead consumers to select less energydense fast food? An experimental study. Appetite. 2013;67(1):8-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013. 03.003

Food Standards Agency (United Kingdom). Consumers give their views on eating out. London: Food Standards Agency; 2008 [cited 2015 Dec 11]. Available from: http://www.food.gov.uk/news/newsarchive/2008/jun/eatout

Mackison D, Wrieden W, Anderson A. Making an informed choice in the catering environment: What do consumers want to know? J Hum Nutr Diet. 2009; 22(6):567-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1365-277X.2009.01000.x

Presidência da República (Brasil). Lei nº 11.105, de 24 de março de 2005: estabelece normas de segurança e mecanismos de fiscalização de atividades que envolvam organismos geneticamente modificados – OGM e seus derivados. Diário Oficial [da] República Fe-derativa do Brasil. 2005.

European Communities. Regulation (EC) nº 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC. Official J. 2003;268:24-8.

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (United Kingdom). Making the food and farming industry more competitive while protecting the Environment. London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; 2014 [cited 2015 Sept 11]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/policies/making-the-foodand-farming-industry-morecompetitive-whileprotecting-the-environment/supporting-pages/genetic-modification

Silveira BM, Gonzalez-Chica DA, Proença RPC. Reporting of trans-fat on labels of Brazilian food products. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(12):2146-53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980013000050

Roe M, Pinchen H, Church S, Elahi S, Walker M, Farron-Wilson M, et al. Trans fatty acids in a range of UK processed foods. Food Chem. 2013;140(3):427-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.08.067

Alexander M, O’Gorman K, Wood K Nutritional labelling in restaurants: Whose responsibility is it anyway? Int J Contemp Hosp Mana. 2010;22(4):572-9. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596111011042758

Ellison B, Lusk JL, Davis D. The effect of calorie labels on caloric intake and restaurant revenue: Evidence from two full-service restaurants. J Agric Appl Econ. 2014;46(2):173-91.

Blumenthal K, Volpp KG. Enhancing the effectiveness of food labeling in restaurants. J Am Med Assoc. 2010;303(6):553-4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama. 2010.85

Lee JWC, Shimizu M, Wansink B. You taste what you see: Do organic labels bias taste perceptions? Food Qual Prefer. 2013;29(1):33-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.01.010

Fernandes AC, Oliveira RC, Rodrigues VM, Fiates GM, da Costa Proença RP. Perceptions of university students regarding calories, food healthiness, and the importance of calorie information in menu labeling. Appetite. 2015;91:173-8. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.appet.2015.04.042

Schornack B, Rozensher S. The effects of menu calorie labeling on consumer food choice behavior. Am J Health Sci. 2014;5(1):29-36. https://doi.org/10. 19030/ajhs.v5i1.8615

Food Standards Agency (United Kingdom). Frontof-pack traffic light signpost labelling: Technical guidance. London: FSA; 2007.

Hammond D, Goodman S, Hanning R, Daniel S. A randomized trial of calorie labeling on menus. Prev Med. 2013;57(6):860-6. https://doi.org/10.10 16/j.ypmed.2013.09.020

Gomez P, Minous AE. L’influence du format de l’l’étiquetage sur l’utilisation et la compréhension de l’information nutritionnelle: résultats d’une expérimentation menée en restauration collective. Rev Epid Sante Publ. 2012;60(1):9-18.

Barbieri T, Rodrigues KS, Silva SF, Medeiros LB, Saccol ALF. Consumer attitudes toward information displayed at food buffets in commercial restaurants. Ciênc Tec Alim. 2012;32(4):798-803.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-16

How to Cite

Carvalho de OLIVEIRA, R., FERNANDES, A. C., Pacheco da Costa PROENÇA, R. ., HARTWELL, H., Mello RODRIGUES, V. ., & Medeiros Rataichesck FIATES, G. . (2023). Preferences for menu labelling formats of young adults in Brazil and in the United Kingdom. Brazilian Journal of Nutrition, 30(3). Retrieved from https://seer.sis.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/7861

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLE