Metanálise de estudos do processamento comunicativo em indivíduos com lesão vascular direita
Palavras-chave:
neuropsicologia, transtornos da comunicação, linguagem, transtornos cerebrovascularesResumo
Esta pesquisa apresenta estudos com indivíduos com lesão vascular no hemisfério direito, investigando-se o desempenho dessa população nos processamentos comunicativos discursivo, pragmático-inferencial, léxico-semântico e prosódico. A literatura de neuropsicologia atual tem enfocado cada vez mais as relações entre linguagem, comunicação, cognição e emoção através do estudo das funções do hemisfério direito em indivíduos com e sem lesão. Foram analisados os aspectos metodológicos e os resultados de 25 estudos das fontes Medline e Science Direct. Evidenciou-se que dos 357 lesados de hemisfério direito participantes, 330 (92,4%) apresentaram alterações quantitativas e/ou qualitativas nas habilidades comunicativas avaliadas. O hemisfério direito parece desempenhar um papel importante no processamento das habilidades comunicativas discursivas, pragmático-inferenciais, léxico-semânticas e prosódicas.
Downloads
Referências
Bara, B. G., Tirassa, M., & Zettin, M. (1997). Neuropragmatics: neuropsychological constraints on formal theories of dialogue. Brain and Language, 59 (1), 7-49.
Bartels-Tobin, L. R., & Hinckley, J. L. (2005). Cognition and discourse production in right hemisphere disorder. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 12 (6), 461-477.
Beausoleil, N., Fortin, R., Le Blanc, B., & Joanette, Y. (2003). Unconstrained oral naming performance in right- and left-hemisphere-damaged individuals: when education overrides the lesion. Aphasiology, 17 (2), 143-158.
Beeman, M. (1993). Semantic processing in the right hemisphere may contribute to drawing inferences from discourse. Brain and Language, 44 (1), 80-120.
Brookshire, R. H. (2003). Introduction to neurogenic communication disorders Missouri: Mosby.
Champagne, M., Desautels, M., & Joanette, Y. (2003). Accounting for the pragmatic déficit in RHD individuals: a multiple case study. Brain and Language, 87 (1), 210-211.
Champagne, M., Virbel, J., Nespoulous, J., & Joanette, Y. (2003). Impact of right hemispheric damage on a hierarchy of complexity evidenced in young normal subjects. Brain and Cognition, 53 (2), 152-157.
Chantraine, Y., Joanette, Y., & Ska, B. (1998). Conversational abilities in patients with right hemisphere damage. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11 (1-2), 21-32.
Charbonneau, S., Scherzer, B. P., Aspirot, D., & Cohen, H. (2003). Perception and production of facial and prosodic emotion by chronic CVA patients. Neuropsychologia, 41 (5), 605-613.
Clark-Carter, D. (2002). Doing quantitative psychological research: from design to report New York: Psychology Press.
Côté, H., Moix, V., & Giroux, F. (2004). Évaluation des troubles de la communication des cérébrolésés droits. Rééducation Orthophonique, 219 (4), 107-122.
Davis, G. A., O'Neil-Pirozzi, T. M., & Coon, M. (1997). Referential cohesion and logical coherence of narration after right hemisphere stroke. Brain and Language, 56 (2), 183-210.
Filskov, S. B., Grimm, B. H., & Lewis, J. A. (1981). Brain-behavior relationships. In S. B. Filskov, & T. J. Boll. Handbook of clinical neuropsychology (pp.39-73). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Foldi, N. S. (1987). Appreciation of pragmatic interpretations of indirect commands: comparison of right and left hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 31 (1), 88-108.
Gutiérrez-Calvo, M. (1999). Inferencias en la comprensión del lenguaje. In M. Veja & F. Cuetos (Orgs.), Psicolinguistica del español (pp.231-270). Madrid: Trotta.
Harley, T. (2001). The psychology of language. New York: Psychology Press.
Hillert, D. G. (2004). Spared access to idiomatic and literal meanings: a single-case approach. Brain and Language, 89 (1), 207-215.
Joanette, Y., Goulet, P., & Hannequin, D. (1990). Right hemisphere and verbal communication New York: Springer.
Kasher, A., Batori, G., Soroker, N., Gravers, D., & Zaidel, E. (1999). Effects of roght and left hemisphere damage on understanding conversational implicatures. Brain and Language, 68 (3), 566-590.
Kelley, R. E. (2003). Afecções dos vasos cerebrais. In W. J. Weinwe & C. G. Goetz. Neurologia para o não-especialista (pp.69-83). São Paulo: Santos.
Kucharska-Pietura, K., Philips, M. L., Gernand, W., & David, A.S. (2003). Perception of emotions from faces and voices following unilateral brain damage. Neuropsychologia, 41 (8), 1082-1090.
Marini, A., Carlomagno, S., Caltagirone, C., & Nocentini, U. (2005). The role played by the right hemisphere in the organization of complex textual structures. Brain and Language, 93 (1), 46-54.
McDonald, S. (1993). Viewing de brain sideways? Frontal versus right hemisphere explanations of nonaphasic language disorders. Aphasiology, 7 (4), 535-549.
McDonald, S. (2000). Exploring the cognitive basis of right-hemisphere pragmatic language disorders. Brain and Language, 75 (1), 82-107.
Nocentini, U., Goulet, P., Roberts, P. M., & Joanette, Y. (2001). The effects of left- versus right-hemisphere lesions on the sensitivity to intra- and interconceptual semantic relationships. Neuropsychogia, 39 (5), 443-451.
Paradis, M. (1998). The other side of language: pragmatic competence. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11 (1-2), 1-10.
Pell, M. D. (1999). Fundamental frequency encoding of linguistic and emotional prosody by right hemisphere-damaged speakers. Brain and Language, 69 (2), 161-192.
Pell, M. D. (2006). Cerebral mechanisms for understanding emotional prosody in speech. Brain and Language, 96 (2), 221-234.
Pell, M. D., & Baum, S. R. (1997). The ability to perceive and comprehend intonation in linguistic and affective contexts by brain-damaged adults. Brain and Language, 57 (1), 80-99.
Sarno, M. T., & Levita, E. (1971). Natural course of recovery in severe aphasia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 52 (2), 175-178.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shah, A.P., Baum, S.R., & Dwivedi, V.D. (2006). Neural substrates of linguistic prosody: evidence from syntactic disambiguation in the productions of brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 96 (1), 78-89.
Soroker, N., Kasher, A., Giora, R., Batori, G., Corn, C., Gil, M., & Zaidel, E. (2005). Processing of basic speech acts following localized brain damage: a new light on the neuroanatomy of language. Brain and Cognition, 57 (2), 214-217.
Van Lancker, D. V. (1997). Rags to riches: our increasing appreciation of cognitive and communicative abilities of the human right cerebral hemisphere. Brain and Language, 57 (1), 1-11.
Vilkki, J., Levänen, S., & Servo, A. (2002). Interference in dual-fluency tasks after anterior and posterior cerebral lesions. Neuropsychologia, 40 (3), 340-348.
Wertz, R. T., Henschel, C. R., Auther, L. L., Ashford, J. R., & Kirshner, H. S. (1998). Affective prosodic disturbance subsequent to right hemisphere stroke: a clinical application. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11 (1-2), 89-102.
Weylman, S. T., Brownell, H. H., Roman, M., & Gardner, H. (1989). Appreciation of indirect requests by left- and right-brain-damaged patients: the effect of verbal context and conventionality of wording. Brain and Language, 36 (4), 580-591.
Winner, E., & Gardner, H. (1977). The comprehension of metaphor in brain-damaged patients. Brain, 100 (4), 717-729.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Rochele Paz FONSECA, Maria Alice de Mattos Pimenta PARENTE
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
