Uma revisão crítica de três perspectivas sobre o desenvolvimento da escrita

Autores/as

  • Tatiana Cury POLLO Universidade Federal de São João Del Rei, Departamento de Psicologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia
  • Rebecca TREIMAN Washington University, Psychology Department, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences.
  • Brett KESSLER Washington University, Psychology Department, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences.

Palabras clave:

Construtivismo, Escrita, Estatística

Resumen

Aprender a ler e a escrever está entre os maiores desafios de uma criança. Um componente importante da alfabetização é a escrita. Apesar do aumento de interesse pela escrita nos últimos anos, seu estudo ainda não atrai tanta atenção quanto o da leitura. Este artigo revisa três perspectivas no estudo do desenvolvimento da escrita: fonológica, construtivista e da aprendizagem estatística. Atenção especial é dada aos estudos que examinam o desenvolvimento da escrita de forma translinguística, já que são cruciais para diferenciar as propriedades do desenvolvimento da escrita que são universais, daquelas que são específicas ao sistema de escrita da criança. As tradicionais perspectivas fonológicas e construtivistas são revisadas e criticamente avaliadas sob a perspectiva da aprendizagem estatística, mediante a revisão de seus conceitos fundamentais, com base estudos recentes que corroboram algumas de suas premissas.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Besse, J. (1996). An approach to writing in kindergarten. In C. Pontecorvo, M. Orsolini, B. Burge, & L. Resnick (Eds.), Children’s early text construction (pp.127-144). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Bissex, G. L. (1980). Gnys at wrk. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Caravolas, M. (2004). Spelling development in alphabetic writing systems: A cross-linguistic perspective. European Psychologist, 9(1), 3-14.

Caravolas, M., & Bruck, M. (1993). The effect of oral and written language input on children’s phonological awareness: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55(1), 1-30.

Cardoso-Martins, C. (2005). Beginning reading acquisition in Brazilian Portuguese. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp.171-188). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cardoso-Martins, C., Corrêa, M. F., Lemos, L. S., & Napoleão, R. F. (2006). Is there a syllabic stage in spelling development? Evidence from Portuguesespeaking children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 628-641.

Cardoso-Martins, C., Resende, S. M., & Rodrigues, L. A. (2002). Letter name knowledge and the ability to learn to read by processing letter-phoneme relations in words: Evidence from Brazilian Portuguese-speaking children. Reading and Writing, 15, 409-432.

Cassar, M., & Treiman, R. (1997). The beginnings of orthographic knowledge: Children’s knowledge of double letters in words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 631-644.

Defior, S., Martos, F., & Cary, L. (2002). Differences in reading acquisition development in shallow orthographies: Portuguese and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 135-148.

Ehri, L. C. (1991). The development of reading and spelling in children: An overview. In M. Snowling & M. Thomson (Eds.), Dyslexia: Integrating theory and practice (pp.63-94). Londres: British Dyslexia Association.

Ehri, L. C. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp.3-40). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Ellefson, M. R., Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2009). Learning to label letters by sounds or names: A comparison of England and the United States. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(3), 323-341.

Evans, M. A., & Saint-Aubin, J. (2005). What children are looking at during shared storybook reading. Psychological Science, 16(11), 913-920.

Ferreiro, E. (1990). Literacy development: Psychogenesis. In Y. Goodman (Ed.), How children construct literacy: Piagetian perspectives (pp.12-25). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Ferreiro, E., Pontecorvo, C., & Zucchermaglio, C. (1996). Pizza or piza? How children interpret the doubling of letters in writing. In C. Pontecorvo, M. Orsolini, B. Burge, & L. Resnick (Eds.), Children’s early text construction (pp.145-163). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Ferreiro, E., & Teberosky, A. (1982). Literacy before schooling. Nova York: Heinemann.

Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp.301-330). Londres: Erlbaum.

Gentry, J. R. (1982). An analysis of developmental spelling in GNYS AT WRK. The Reading Teacher, 36(2), 192-200.

Gough, P. B., & Hillinger, M. L. (1980). Learning to read: An unnatural act. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 30, 179-196.

Hayes, H., Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2006). Children use vowels to help them spell consonants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94(1), 27-42.

Henderson, E. (1985). Teaching spelling. Boston: Houghton Mifflin

Houghton, G., & Zorzi, M. (2003). Normal and impaired spelling in a connectionist dual-route architecture. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(2), 115-162.

Hutzler, F., Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Wimmer, H., & Zorzi, M. (2004). Do current connectionist learning models account for reading development in different languages? Cognition, 91(3), 273-296.

International Phonetic Association. (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kamii, C., Long, R., Manning, M., & Manning, G. (1990). Spelling in kindergarten: A constructivist analysis comparing Spanish-speaking and English-speaking children. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 4(2), 91-97.

Kessler, B. (2009). Statistical learning of conditional orthographic correspondences. Writing Systems Research, 1(1), 19-34. Kessler, B., Pollo, T. C., Treiman, R., & Cardoso-Martins, C. (2013). Frequency analyses of prephonological spellings as predictors of success in conventional spelling. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 9(4), 317-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022219412449440

Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (2001). Relationships between sounds and letters in English monosyllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(4), 592-617.v

Levin, I., & Aram, D. (2004). Children’s names contribute to early literacy: A Linguistic and a social perspective. In D. Ravid & H. Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development (pp.219-239). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Levin, I., Patel, S., Margalit, T., & Barad, N. (2002). Letter names: Effect on letter saying, spelling, and word recognition in Hebrew. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 269-300.

Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F. W., & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201-212.

Nunes Carraher, T., & Rego, L. R. B. (1984). Desenvolvimento cognitivo e alfabetização. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Pedagógicos, 63(149), 38-55.

Pacton, S., Perruchet, P., Fayol, M., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Implicit learning out of the lab: The case of orthographic regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(3), 401-426.

Pinheiro, A. M. V. (1996). Contagem de freqüência de ocorrência de palavras expostas a crianças na faixa pré-escolar e séries iniciais do 1o grau. São Paulo: ABD.

Pollo, T. C., Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (2005). Vowels, syllables, and letter names: Differences between young children’s spelling in English and Portuguese. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92(2), 161-181.

Pollo, T. C., Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (2009). Statistical patterns in children’s early writing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104(4), 410-426.

Pontecorvo, C. (1996). Introduction. In C. Pontecorvo, M. Orsolini, B. Burge, & L. Resnick (Eds.), Children’s early text construction (pp.345-357). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Pontecorvo, C., & Zucchermaglio, C. (1988). Modes of differentiation in children’s writing construction. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 3(4), 371-384.

Read, C. (1986). Children’s creative spelling. Londres: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926-1928.

Seidenberg, M. S. (1997). Language acquisition and use: Learning and applying probabilistic constraints. Science, 275(5306), 1599-1603.

Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European languages. British Journal of Psychology, 94(Pt 2), 143-175

Silva, C., & Alves-Martins, M. (2002). Phonological skills and writing of pre-syllabic children. Reading Research Quarterly, 37(4), 466-483.

Stein, L. M. (1994). TDE: Teste de desempenho escolar: manual para aplicação e interpretação. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo.

Treiman, R. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. Nova York: Oxford University Press.

Treiman, R. (1994). Use of consonant letter names in beginning spelling. Developmental Psychology, 30(4), 567-580.

Treiman, R., & Broderick, V. (1998). What’s in a name: Children’s knowledge about the letters in their own names. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 70, 97-116.

Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2003). The role of letter names in the acquisition of literacy. In R. Kail (Ed.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior (Vol.31, pp.105-135). San Diego: Academic Press.

Treiman, R., Kessler, B., & Bourassa, D. (2001). Children’s own names influence their spelling. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22(4), 555-570.

Treiman, R., Kessler, B., & Pollo, T. C. (2006). Learning about the letter name subset of the vocabulary: Evidence from U.S. and Brazilian preschoolers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(2), 211-227.

Varnhagen, C. K., Boechler, P. M., & Steffler, D. J. (1999). Phonological and orthographic influences on children’s vowel spelling. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(4), 363-379.

Vernon, S. A., & Ferreiro, E. (1999). Writing development: A neglected variable in the consideration of phonological awareness. Harvard Educational Review, 69(4), 395-414.

Wimmer, H., & Hummer, P. (1990). How German speaking first graders read and spell: Doubts on the importance of the logographic stage. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11(40), 349-368.

Wimmer, H., & Landerl, K. (1997). How learning to spell German differs from learning to spell English. In C. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp.81-96). Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Zacks, R. T., & Hasher, L. (2002). Frequency processing: A twenty-five year perspective. In P. Sedlmeier (Ed.), Frequency processing and cognition (pp.21-36). Londres: University Press.

Zeno, S. M., Ivenz, S. H., Millard, R. T., & Duvvuri, R. (1995). The educator’s word frequency guide. Brewster, NY: Touchstone Applied Science Associates.

Publicado

2023-04-13

Cómo citar

POLLO, T. C., TREIMAN, R., & KESSLER, B. (2023). Uma revisão crítica de três perspectivas sobre o desenvolvimento da escrita. Estudos De Psicologia, 32(3). Recuperado a partir de https://seer.sis.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/8215

Número

Sección

PSICOLOGIA DO ENSINO E DA APRENDIZAGEM