Laparoscopic treatment of retrocaval ureter

experience with six cases

Authors

  • Thiago Massato Carcinoni Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas
  • Lísias Nogueira Castilho Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas
  • José Cocifran Milfont Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas

Keywords:

Laporoscopy, Ureter, Vena cava, inferior

Abstract

The objective of the study was to report the experience of laparoscopic repair in
6 retrocaval ureter cases. Retrocaval ureter repair was made using two different
techniques: the retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approach. The mean surgery
time was 90 minutes, with no difference between the retroperitoneal and
transperitoneal procedures. All patients were allowed to eat on the first
postoperative day and discharged on the second day. Three months later, a control
assessment was made using intravenous urography with minimal dilatation, and
a diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid renal scintigraphy with no signs of
obstruction. The patients were followed for up to 120 months and all of them
were asymptomatic. Laparoscopy can be considered a standard procedure to
treat retrocaval ureter, since studies have shown that this technique is better than
open surgery. The retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach is up to the surgeon,
according to his or her experience and practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Soundappan SVS, Barker AP. Retrocava! ureter in children: a report of two cases. Pediatr Surg lnt. 2004; 20(2):158-60.

Sinforoosh N, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Tabibi A. Laparoscopic pyelopyelostomy for retrocava! ureter without excision of the retrocava! segment: first report of 6 cases. J Urol. 2006; 175(6):2166-9.

Mitchell J, Stahlfeld KR, Cercone RG. Retrocava! ureter with intestinal malrotation. Urology. 2003; 62(1): 142-3.

Srougi M, Macedo JRA, Pinheiro M. Retrocava! ureter in children: a rare case of antenatal hydronefrosis. Braz J Urol. 2000; 26(1):196-8.

Pienky AJ, Herts B, Streem SB. Contemporary diagnosis of retrocava! ureter. J Endourol. 1999; 13(10):721-2.

Friebel N, Bolten M, Fernandez de la Maza S. Retrokavaler harnleiter. Urologe. 2004; 43(6): 708-10.

Baba S, Oya M, Miyahara M, Deguchi N, Tazki H. Laparoscopic surgical corretion of circuncaval ureter. Urology. 1994; 44(1):122-6

Tobias-Machado M, Lasmar MT, Wroclawski ER. Retroperitoneoscopic surgery with extracorporeal uretero-ureteral anastomosis for treating retrocava! ureter. lnt Braz J Urol. 2005; 31(2):147-50.

Ameda K, Kakizaki H, Harabayashi T, Watarai Y, Nonomura K, Koyanagi T. Laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy for retrocava! ureter. lnt J Urol. 2001; 8(2):71-3

Gupta NP, Hemal AK, Singh 1, Khaitan A. Retroperitoneoscopic ureterolysis and reconstruction of retrocava! ureter. J Endourol. 2001; 15(3):291-3.

Ramalingham M, Selvarajan K. Laparoscopic transperitoneal repair of retrocava! ureter: report of two cases. J Endourol. 2003, 17(2) 85-8.

Mugiya S, Suzuki K, Ohhira T, Un-No T, Takayama T, Fujita K. Retroperitoneoscopic treatment of a retrocava! ureter. lnt J Urol. 1999; 6(8):419-22.

Published

2009-08-31

How to Cite

Carcinoni, T. M., Castilho, L. N., & Milfont, J. C. (2009). Laparoscopic treatment of retrocaval ureter: experience with six cases. Revista De Ciências Médicas, 18(4). Retrieved from https://seer.sis.puc-campinas.edu.br/cienciasmedicas/article/view/638

Issue

Section

Relato de Caso