Study of the antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine in dental unit water: Evaluation of microbial contamination in the dental Office
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24220/2318-0897v22n2a2130Keywords:
Bacteria, Anaerobic, Contamination, Dental equipment, ChlorhexidineAbstract
Objective
The aim of this study was to count anaerobic bacteria before and after the use of dental equipment and to study the influence of chlorhexidine on the dental unit reservoir water.
Methods
Sterile swabs were used to collect bacterial samples from the cuspidor, lights, syringes, low- and high-speed handpieces, and dental chairs (arms and backrest) before and after the placement of barriers. Blood agar plates were placed on the patient’s and dentist’s forehead and by the patient’s nose and shoulder and exposed to aerosols without (Group 1) and with 0.5% (Group 2) and 1.0% (Group 3) chlorhexidine generated by the high-speed handpiece. Ten aerosol samples were collected for each group. A sample of 1mL of the dental unit reservoir water was collected before and after the use of the high-speed handpiece. The anaerobic bacterial counts were compared by the Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis tests.
Results
The contamination on the high-speed handpiece (p=0.0431) and cuspidor (p=0.0117) increased significantly after use. Contamination in the dental unit reservoir water also increased significantly after use of the high-speed handpiece. The most contaminated area was the patient’s nose.
Conclusion
The addition of 0.5% and 1.0% chlorhexidine in the dental unit reservoir water reduced the microbial contamination in the dental office significantly.
Downloads
References
Klevens RM, Gorwitz RJ, Collins AS. Methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus a primer for dentists. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008; 139:1328-37.
Decreane V, Pronto D, Pratten J, Wilson M. Air-borne microbial contamination of surfaces in a UK dental clinic. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 2008; 54:195-203.
Gigola P, Angelillo V, Garusi G. Effectiveness of a glutaraldehyde formulation in decontamination of dental unit water systems. Minerva Stomatol. 2006; 55(7-8):437-48.
Cristina ML, Spagnolo AM, Sartini M, Dallera M, Ottria G, Lombardi R, et al. Evaluation of the risk of infection through exposure to aerosols and spatters in dentistry. Am J Infect Control. 2008; 36(4):304-7.
ADA statement on dental unit waterlines. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996; 127(2):185-6.
Meiller TF, Kelley JI, Baqui AAMA, DePaola LG. Laboratory evaluation of anti-biofilm agents for use in dental unit waterlines. J Clin Dent. 2001; 12(4):97-103.
Thomas LP, Abramovitch K. Infection control. Tex Dent J. 2005; 122(2):184-8.
Porteous NB, Cooley RL. Reduction of bacterial levels in dental unit waterlines. Quintessence Int. 2004; 35(8):630-4.
Lawrence JR, Zhu B, Swerhone GDW, Topp E, Roy J, Wassenaar LI, et al. Community-level assessment of the effects of the broad-spectrum antimicrobial chlorhexidine on the outcome of river microbial biofilm development. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008; 74(11):3541-50.
Miller RL. Generation of airborne infection by high speed dental equipment. J Am Soc Prev Dent. 1976; 6(3):14-7.
Schneider DJ, Combe EC, Martens LV. The effect of washing water on bonding to etched enamel. J Oral Rehabil. 2004; 31(1):85-9.
Barbeau J. Waterborne biofilms and dentistry: The changing face of infection control. J Can Dent Assoc. 2000; 66(10):539-41.
Epstein JB, Dawson JR, Buivids IA, Wong B, Le ND. The effect of a disinfectant/coolant irrigant on microbes isolated from dental unit water lines. Spec Care Dentist. 2002; 22(4):137-41.
Scott BA, Felix CA, Price RBT. Effect of disposable infection control barriers on light output from dental curing lights. J Can Dent Assoc. 2004; 70(2):105-10.
Souza-Gugelmin MCM, Lima CDT, Lima SNM, Mian H, Ito IY. Microbial contamination in dental unit waterlines. Braz Dent J. 2003; 14(1):55-7.
Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: A common cause of persistent infections. Science. 1999; 284(5418):1318-22.
Schel AJ, Marsh PD, Bradshaw DJ, Finney M, Fulford MR, Frandsen E, et al. Comparison of the efficacies of disinfectants to control microbial contamination in dental unit water systems in general dental practices across the European Union. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006; 72(2):1380-7.
Bishara SE, Damon PL, Olsen ME, Jakobsen JR. Effect of applying chlorhexidine antibacterial agent on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod. 1996; 66(4):313-6.
Ranganathan NS. Clhorhexidine. In: Ascenzi JM. Handbook of disinfectants and antiseptics. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1996. p.235-64.
Hope CK, Wilson M. Analysis of the effects of chlorhexidine on oral biofilm vitality and structure based on viability profiling and an indicator of membrane integrity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004; 48(5):1461-8.
Fardal O, Turnbull RS. A review of the literature on use of chlorhexidine in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 1986; 112(6):863-9.
Sreenivasan PK, Gittins E. The effects of chlorhexidine mouthrinse on culturable organisms of the tongue and saliva. Microbiol Res. 2004; 159(4):365-70.
Ferraz CCR, Gomes BPFA, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, Souza- Filho FJ. Comparative study of the antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine gel, chlorhexidine solution and sodium hypochlorite as endodontic irrigants. Braz Dent J. 2007; 18(4):294-8.
Lobo PLD, Carvalho CBM, Fonseca SCC, Castro RSL, Monteiro AJ, Fonteles MC, et al. Sodium fluoride and chlorhexidine effect in the inhibition of mutans strptococci in children with dental caries: A randomized. Double-Blind Clinical Trial Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2008; 23(6):486-91.
Du MQ, Tai BJ, Jiang H, Lo EC, Fan MW, Bian Z. A twoyear randomized clinical Trial of chlorhexidine varnish on dental caries in Chinese preschool children. J Dent Res. 2006; 85(6):557-9.
