PERFORMANCE OF CLINICAL EXAMINATION OF THE BREAST FOR DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF BREAST NODULES

Authors

  • Orlando José de Almeida
  • Jessé de Paula Neves Jorge
  • José Guilherme Cecatti

Keywords:

breast neoplasms, breast lump, clinical examination, diagnosis, differential

Abstract

There is an increasing number of breast cancer cases each year, and its majority has been diagnosed upon the existence of a palpable breast module. In these cases, the clinical examination approach can be helpful, provided it presents a good performance for this diagnosis. This prospective study evaluated sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of clinical examination in the diferential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast nodules. One hundred and two women with palpable breast masses and over 30 years old were evaluated. The clinical examination showed a sensitivity of93%, specificity of94%, positive predictive value of79% and negative predictive value of86%. When compared to other two exams (mammography andfine-needle aspiration biopsy), there was no significant diference concerning sensitivity of these exams for the diagnosis of malignant breast nodules. The clinical examination of breast is highly important, specially taking into account the little availability of propedeutic exams in our country.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BOYD. N.F. et al. Prospective evaluation of physical examination of the breast. Am J Surg, Newton, v.142, p.331-334, 1981.

DI PIETRO, S. et al. Systematic use of the clinical mammographic-cytologic triplet for the early diagnosis of mammary carcinoma. Tumori, Milano, v.71, p. 179-185, 1985.

GARCIA-SAINZ, M., BORREGO-ROMAN, R., TOUSSAINT-GORIBAR, O. Estudio comparativo de métodos de exploraciön mamaria. Arch Invest Med, México, v. 12, p.89-106, 1981.

KAUFMAN, Z. et al. Triple approach in the diagnosis of dominant breast masses: combined physical examination, mammography and fineneedle aspiration. J Surg Oncol, New York, v.56, p.254-257, 1994.

PACHECO, J.P. Eficacia de los métodos de diagnostico en patologia mamaria. Rev Chil Cirurg, Santiago, v.45, p.282-287, 1993.

PINOTTI, J.A. Exame clinico. In: PINOTTI, J.A. Compéndio de mastologia. Säo Paulo: Manole, 1991. p.23-35.

PINOTTI, J.A., HEGG, R. Perspectivas para o tratamento do câncer de mama nos anos 2000. In: PIATTO, S. Mastoiogia. São Paulo : Rocca, 1995. p.263-274.

ROTSTEIN, S. et al. Clinical examination, mammography findings and cytological diagnosis in patients with breast disorders: results of 9 years follow-up. Acta Oncol, Oslo, v.31, n.4, p.393-397, 1992.

STEINBERG, J.L. et al. Combined fine-needle aspiration, physical examination and mammography in the diagnosis ofpalpable breast masses: their relation to outcome for women with primary breast cancer. CanJSurg, Ottawa, v.39, p. 128-132, 1996.

TARTTER, P.l., SAMUELS, J., BRATTON, J. Clinical examination, mammography and fineneedle aspiration cytology in the managment of palpable breast masses. Breast J, v.3, p. 127-130, 1997.

VETTO, J.T. et al. Use of the "triple test" for palpable breast lesions yield high diagnosis accuracy and cost savings. Am J Surg, Newton, v.169, n.5, p.519-522, 1995.

VETTO, J. T. et al. Diagnosis of palpable breast lesions in younger women by the modified triple test is accurate and cost-effective. Arch Surg, Chicago, v.131, n.9, p.967-972, 1996.

Published

1998-08-31

How to Cite

Almeida, O. J. de, Jorge, J. de P. N., & Cecatti, J. G. (1998). PERFORMANCE OF CLINICAL EXAMINATION OF THE BREAST FOR DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF BREAST NODULES. Revista De Ciências Médicas, 7(2). Retrieved from https://seer.sis.puc-campinas.edu.br/cienciasmedicas/article/view/1364

Issue

Section

Artigos Originais