Expectant versus active management with oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term

Authors

  • Ricardo Porto Tedesco
  • José Guilherme Cecatti
  • Nelson Lourenço Maia Filho

Keywords:

PROM, labor induced, pregnancy, high-risk, oxytocin, fetal membranes, premature rupture

Abstract

Objective
To compare tbe expectant and the active management with oxytocin for premature rupture ofmembranes at term.
Method
A multicentric randomized clinicai triai was carried out, evaluating variables concerning labor and delivery complications, and other maternal and neonatal outcomes. Two hundred pregnant women with premature rupture ofmembranes at term were selected from four public hospitais in the State ofSão Paulo, Brazil. They were randomly divided into two groups: active management, with oxytocin induction if labor had not initiated spontaneously within the first six hours after the rupture; and expectant management, waiting for the spontaneous onset of labor up to 24 hours. For the statistical analysis the Chi-square, Mann-Whitney, Fisher's Exact, Student's t tests were used.

Results
The values for the maio variables were not significantly different between the groups, although the negative outcomes were concentrated in the expectant management group. Only the latent period and the time between the rupture of the membranes and the delivery were significantly longer for the expectant management than for the active management with oxytocin stimulation.
Conclusion
Although the results did not show very important differences between the two managements for premature rupture of membraues at term, the active management bad a relatively better performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Meikle SF, Bissell ME, Freedman WL, Gibbs RS. A retrospective review ofthe efficacy and safety ofprostaglandin E2 with premature rupture ofthe membranes at term. ObstetGynecol 1992; 80:76-9.

Gravett MG, Nelson HP, Derouen T, Critchlow C, Eschenbach DA, Holmes KK. Independent associations of bacterial vaginosis and Chlamydia trachomatis infection with adverse pregnancy outcomes. JAMA 1986; 256: 1899-903.

Kenyon SL, Taylor DJ, Tarnow-Mordi W. ORACLE Collaborative Group. Broad-spectrum antibiotics for preterm, prelabour rupture offetal membranes: the ORACLE Irandomized triai. Lancet 2001; 357(9261): 979-88.

Rathmer L, Scheidel P. Prernature rupture offetal mernbranes at term: sequelae of conservative management. An analysis of a personal patient sample. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2000; 204(2): 43-8.

Hannah ME, Ohlsson A, Farine D, Hewson AS, Hodnett ED, Myhr TL, et ai. Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the mernbranes at term. N Eng J Med 1996; 334: 1005-10.

Veille JC. Management of preterm premature ruptureofmembranes. ClinPerinatol 1988; 15:851-61.

Grant J, Keirse MJNC. Prelabour rupture of the membranes at term. ln: Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC, editors. Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications. 1991.

Tan BP, Hannah ME. Oxytocin for prelabour rupture of membranes near term (Cochrane Review). /n: The CochraneLibrary Oxford: Update Software; 2002. Issue 3.

Duff P, Huff RW, Gibbs RS. Management of premature rupture of membranes and unfavorable cervix in term pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 697-702.

Morales WJ, Lazar AJ. Expectant management of rupture of membranes.at term. South Med J 1986; 79: 955-8.

Grant JM, Serie E, Mahmood T, Sarmandal P, Conway DI. Managernent of prelabour rupture of the membranes in term primigravidae: report of a randomized prospective triai. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99:557-62.

Pocock SJ. Clinicai triais. A practical approach. Bath: John Wiley & Sons; 1983.

Tedesco RP, Maia Filho NL, Cecatti J G, Andreoni R. Comparação entre conduta ativa com ocitocina e conduta expectante na rotura prematura de membranas em gestações a termo. Rev Brasil Ginecol Obstet 1998; 20(9):495-501.

Tamsen L, Lyrenãs S, Cnattingius S. Premature rupture of the membranes: intervention or not. Ginecol Obstet Invest 1990; 29: 128-31

SperlingLS, etal. Managementofprelabor rupture of membranes at term. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1993; 72:627-32.

Natale R, Milne JK, Campbell MK, Potts PG, Webster K, Halinda E. Management ofpremature rupture ofmembranes at term: randomized triai. Am JObstetGynecol 1994; 171:936-9.

Verber IG, Pearce JM, New LC, Hamilton PA, Davies EG. Prolonged rupture of the fetal mernbranes and neonatal outcome. J Perinat Med 1989; 17:469-76.

Zlatnik FJ. Management for premature rupture of membranes atterm. ObstetGinecol ClinNorthAm 1992; 19(2):383-94.

Brown CL, LudwicazkMH, Blanco JD, Hirsch CE. Cervical dilatation: accuracy ofvisual and digital examination. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81:215.

Bugalho A, Bique C, Machungo F, Faúndes A. Low-dose vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor with a live fetus. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1995; 49:149-55.

Wing DA, Jones MM, Rahall A, Goodwin TM, Paul RH. Comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for pre-induction cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol1995; 172:1804-10.

Published

2002-07-29

How to Cite

Tedesco, R. P., Cecatti, J. G., & Maia Filho, N. L. (2002). Expectant versus active management with oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term. Revista De Ciências Médicas, 11(2). Retrieved from https://seer.sis.puc-campinas.edu.br/cienciasmedicas/article/view/1294

Issue

Section

Artigos Originais