A DIMENSÃO RETÓRICA DA RACIONALIDADE CIENTÍFICA
Palavras-chave:
retórica científica, racionalidade científicaResumo
Existe um interesse crescente pela retórica científica na atual Filosofia da Ciência, mas a defesa da retórica parece amiúde um ataque à racionalidade científica. Este artigo apresenta os principais aspectos retóricos da argumentação científica e defende que a admissão da retórica, longe de ameaçar a racionalidade da ciência, a esclarece e a reforça.
Downloads
Referências
BAZERMAN, Charles (1988)Shaping Written Knowledge. Madison-London :The Univ. of Winsconsin Press.
Bloor, David (1980; orig. 1976) Knowledge and Social Imaginery. London-Boston : Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Bunge, Mario (1985) Racionalidad y Realismo. Madrid: Alianza.
BUNGE, Mario (1991) "Una caricatura de la ciencia: la novísima sociologia de la ciencia" Interciencia 16:69-77.
CU PANI, Alberto (1990) "Porque não Feyerabend?Reflexão 47: 115-121
CUPANI, Alberto (1994) "A Filosofia da Ciência de Larry Laudan e a crítica do 'Positivismo' ". Manuscrito, XVI1(1): 91-143.
FEYERABEND, Paul (1994; orig. 1975)Against Method. London-New York: Verso.
FINOCCHIARO, Mauricio (1980) Galileo and the Art of Reasoning. Rhetorical Foundations of Logic and Scientific Method. Dord recht: Reidel.
GILBERT, Nigel (1973) '’Referencing as Persuasion". Soc. Stud. of Sci., 7:113-122.
GROSS, alan G. (1990) The Rhetoric of Science. Cambridge, Mass-London: Harvard University Press.
KITCHEF3, Philip (1991) "Persuaslon", in Pera, M. e Shea, W. (eds) Persuading Science, pp. 3-27.
KUHN, Thomas S. (1970; orig. 1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: ChIcago Univ. Press.
KUHN, Thomas S. (1977) "Objectivity, Value Judgements and Theory Choice", in: Kuhn, Th. S. The Essential Tension. Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 320-339.
LATOUFR, B. e Woolgar, S. (1986; orig. 1979) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press.
LAUDAN, Larry (1977) Progress and its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley-Los Angeles-London: University of California Press.
PERA, Marcello (1988) "Breaking the Link Between Methodology and Rationality. A PleaforRhetoric in Scientific Inquiry in: Batens, D. e Van BENDEGEM, J. P. (eds) Theory and Experiment. Dordrecht-Boston: D. Reidel, pp. 259-276.
PERA, Marcello (1991) "The Role and Value of Rhetoric inscience", in: Pera, M. e Shea, W. (eds) Persuading Science, pp. 29-53.
PERA, Marcello (1994) The Discourses of Science (trad. do orig. ital. "Scienza e Retorica"). Chicago-London: The Univ. of Chicago Press.
PERA, M. e Shea, W. (eds) (1991) Persuading Science. The Art of Scientific Rhetoric. Carlton, MA: science History Pub. U.S.A.
PRELLI, Lawrence J. (1989)A Rhetoric of Science. Inventing Seientific Discourse. ColumbÊa: Univ. of Carolina Press.
RAVETZ, Jerry (1971 )Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems. New York: Oxford.
SANDERS, Robert (1990) "Discoursive Constraints on the Acceptance of Knowledge Claims: The Conversation about Conversation", in: Simons, H. (ed) The Rhetorical Turn, pp. 145-161.
SHAPIN, Steve (1984) "Pump and Circumsance: Robert Boyle's Literary Technology". Soc. Stud. ofSci. 14:481-520.
SIMONS, Herbert (ed) (1990) The Rhetorical Turn. Invention and Persuation in the Conduct of Inquiry. Chicago-London: The Univ. of Chicago Press.
BROWN, Harold (1984) La Nueva Filosofia de la Ciencia (’'Perception and Commitment: The New Philosophy of Science", 1977). Madrid: Tecnos.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Alberto CUPANI
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
