UMA CRÍTICA AO FORMALISMO NEOCONTRATUALISTA DE RAWLS

Authors

  • Enrique DUSSEL

Abstract

This paper aims at pointing out the difficulties faced by a formalistic theoryofethics . The author claims that every formalism turns into an ideological philosophy of the system in force. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rawls. 1971. c. 111, 95 20-30 (pp. 118ss; pp. 143ss)

lbid., p. 136; p. 163.

Manuscritos del 44, l; Marx, 1956, t. 1 EB. p. 511; p. 105.

lbid., c. II, S 10 (p. 57; p. 78).

lbid., p. 58; p. 80. "Formal justice is adherence to principle [...] obedience to system".

lbid., 5 11, p. 60-61 ; p. 82.

Rawls, 1971, 5 13; p. 75; p. 106.

lbid.. 11, p. 61; p. 83.

Marx, 1974, p-159; p. 186.

lbid., § 16, p. ; pp. 119-120.

lbid., § 17, p. 100; p. 123.

lbid.. p. 102; pp. 124-125.

lbid,. III. c. IX. § 81. p, 535; pp. 590-591.

Rawls. 1993.

lbid., 11, c. IV, 5 42, p. 265; p. 302.

Véase, en su aspecto formal la obra de Ulrich, 1993.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-20

How to Cite

DUSSEL, E. (2024). UMA CRÍTICA AO FORMALISMO NEOCONTRATUALISTA DE RAWLS. Reflexão, 21(64/65). Retrieved from https://seer.sis.puc-campinas.edu.br/reflexao/article/view/11492

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 64/65 (1996): Reflexão

Section

Artigos

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Enrique DUSSEL

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.