A importância da teoria
estratégias analíticas da Psicologia Crítica
Palavras-chave:
Psicologia Crítica, Teorias psicológicas, SubjetividadeResumo
O artigo descreve preocupações e estratégias analíticas da Psicologia Crítica com base na Psicologia Crítica sob o Ponto de Vista do Sujeito. O primeiro passo consiste em situar o desenvolvimento das psicologias críticas nas discussões atuais sobre a produção de conhecimento e delinear três abordagens típicas diferentes e passos principais para a elaboração da crítica situada como prática de reconhecimento mútuo. Argumenta-se que esta mudança levou a uma pertinência historicamente nova da crítica, e dois elementos analíticos básicos da pesquisa crítica são introduzidos: conflitualidade diária como o momento que inicia a crítica e a importância da teoria para a investigação crítica. Assim, apresentamos uma variedade de estratégias e conceitos analíticos, informando a Psicologia Crítica do Ponto de Vista do Sujeito e sugerindo um movimento constituinte das perspectivas parciais à generalização situada.
Downloads
Referências
Allespach, M., & Held, J. (Eds.) (2014). Handbuch Subjektwissenschaft. Ein emanzipatorischer Ansatz in Forschung und Praxis. Köln: Bund-Verlag.
Axel, E. (2011). Conflictual cooperation. Nordic Psychology, 63(4), 56-78.
Dafermos, M., & Marvakis, A. (2006). Critiques in psychology: Critical psychology. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 5. Retrieved February 1, 2015, from www.discourseunit.com/arcp/5
Dafermos, M., Marvakis, A., & Triliva, S. (2006). Special issue: Critical psychology in a changing world (Contributions from different geo-political regions). Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 5. Retrieved February 1, 2015, from www.discourseunit.com/arcp/5
Dafermos, M., Marvakis, A., Mentinis, M., Painter, D., & Triliva, S. (2013). Critical psychology in a changing world: Building bridges and expanding the dialogue. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 10. Retrieved February 1, 2015, from www.discourseunit.com/arcp/10
Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. London: Sage.
Dreier, O. (2008). Psychotherapy in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fox, D., Prilleltensky, I., & Austin, S. (Eds.). (2009). Critical psychology: An introduction. London: Sage.
Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. New York: Oxford University Press.
Giorgi, A. (2009) The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Grubitzsch, S. (1988). Zur Geschichte der Zeitschrift “Psychologie und Gesellschaftskritik”. In G. Rexilius (Ed.), Psychologie als Gesellschaftswissenschaft. Geschichte, Theorie und Praxis kritischer Psychologie. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Guzzo, R. S. L. (2014). Conscientization and political change. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp.300-303). New York: Springer.
Guzzo, R. S. L. (2015). Critical psychology and the American continent: From colonization and domination to liberation and emancipation. In I. Parker (Ed.), Handbook of critical psychology (pp.406-414). London: Routledge
Haraway, D. J. (1991). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspectives. In D. J. Haraway. Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp.183-201). New York: Routledge.
Harré, R. (1979). Social being: A theory for social psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Haug, F. et al. (1999). Female sexualization: A collective work of memory. London: Verso classics.
Hess, D. (1997). Science studies: An advanced introduction. New York: New York University Press.
Højholt, C. (2015). Situated inequality and the conflictuality of children’s conduct of life. In E. Schraube & C. Højholt (Eds.), Psychology and the conduct of everyday life (pp.145-163). London: Routledge.
Holzkamp, K. (1983a). Grundlegung der Psychologie. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
Holzkamp, K. (1983b). Theorie und Praxis im Psychologiestudium. Forum Kritische Psychologie, 12, 159-183.
Holzkamp, K. (2013a). Basic concepts of critical psychology. In E. Schraube & U. Osterkamp (Eds.), Psychology from the standpoint of the subject: Selected writings of Klaus Holzkamp (pp.19-27). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Holzkamp, K. (2013b). The development of critical psychology as a subject science. In E. Schraube & U. Osterkamp (Eds.), Psychology from the standpoint of the subject: Selected writings of Klaus Holzkamp (pp.28-45). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Holzkamp, K. (2013c). What could a psychology from the standpoint of the subject be? In E. Schraube & U. Osterkamp (Eds.), Psychology from the standpoint of the subject: Selected writings of Klaus Holzkamp (pp.46-59). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Holzkamp, K. (2013d). Psychology: Social selfunderstanding on the reasons for action in the conduct of everyday life. In E. Schraube & U. Osterkamp (Eds.), Psychology from the standpoint of the subject: Selected writings of Klaus Holzkamp (pp.233-341). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Holzkamp, K. (2015). Conduct of everyday life as a basic concept of critical psychology. In E. Schraube & C. Højholt (Eds.), Psychology and the conduct of everyday life (pp.65-98). London: Routledge.
Hook, D. (Ed.) (2004). Critical psychology. Lansdowne: UCT Press.
Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Kousholt, D. (2015). Collaborative research with children: Exploring contradictory conditions of the conduct of everyday life. In E. Schraube & C. Højholt (Eds.), Psychology and the conduct of everyday life (pp.241-258). London: Routledge.
Lacerda Jr., F. (2013). Critical psychology in Brazil: A sketch of its history between the end of the 20th century and the early 21st century. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 10. Retrieved February 1, 2015, from www.discourseunit.com/arcp/10
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Leontyev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Martín-Baró, I. (1994). Writings for a liberation psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Marx, K. (1981). Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie. Einleitung. In Marx-Engels-Werke, Band 1 (pp.378-391). Berlin: Dietz Verlag.
Mattes, P. (1985). Die Psychologiekritik der Studentenbewegung. In M. G. Ash & U. Geuter (Eds.), Geschichte der deutschen Psychologie im 20. Jahrhundert. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Motzkau, J., & Schraube, E. (2015). Kritische Psychologie: Psychology from the standpoint of the subject. In I. Parker (Ed.), Handbook of critical psychology (pp.280-289). London: Routledge.
Nissen, M. (2012). The subjectivity of participation: Articulating social work practice with youth in Copenhagen. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Osterkamp, U. (2009). Knowledge and practice in critical psychology. Theory & Psychology, 19(2), 167-191.
Osterkamp, U. (2015). “There is no right life in the wrong one”: Recognizing this dilemma is the first step out of it. In E. Schraube & C. Højholt (Eds.), Psychology and the conduct of everyday life (pp.164-175). London: Routledge
Painter, D., Marvakis, A., & Mos, L. (2009). German critical psychology: Interventions in honour of Klaus Holzkamp. Theory & Psychology, 19(2), 139-147.
Papadopoulos, D. (2009). Klaus Holzkamp’s critical social science. Theory & Psychology, 19(2), 161-166.
Papadopoulos, D. (2011). Alter-ontologies: Towards a constituent politics in technoscience. Social Studies of Science, 41(2), 177-201.
Parker, I. (Ed.) (2015). Handbook of critical psychology. London: Routledge.
Reimer, K., & Markard, M. (2014). German critical psychology. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp.784-791). New York: Springer.
Restivo, S. (1988). Modern science as a social problem. Social Problems, 35, 206-225.
Rexilius, G. (Ed.) (1988). Psychologie als Gesellschaftswissenschaft: Geschichte, Theorie und Praxis kritischer Psychologie. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Schraube, E. (2003). The politics of TechKnowledge. An experimental moment in psychology. In N. Stephenson, H. L. Radtke, R. Jorna, & H. J. Stam (Eds.), Theoretical psychology: Critical contributions (pp.39-45). Toronto: Captus University Publications.
Schraube, E. (2013). First-person perspective and sociomaterial decentering: Studying technology from the standpoint of the subject. Subjectivity, 6(1), 12-32.
Schraube, E. (2014). First-person perspective. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp.733-736). New York: Springer
Schraube, E., & Højholt, C. (Eds.) (2015). Psychology and the conduct of everyday life. London: Routledge.
Schraube, E., & Osterkamp, U. (Eds.) (2013). Psychology from the standpoint of the subject: Selected writings of Klaus Holzkamp. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sloan, T. (Ed.) (2000). Critical psychology: Voices for change. Basingstoke: MacMillan.
Stephenson, N., & Papadopoulos, D. (2006). Analysing everyday experience: Social research and political change. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Teo, T. (2005). The critique of psychology: From Kant to postcolonial theory. New York: Springer.
Teo, T. (Ed.) (2014a). Encyclopedia of critical psychology. New York: Springer.
Teo, T. (2014b). Critical psychology. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp.236-248). New York: Springer.
Teo, T. (2015). Critical psychology: A geography of intellectual engagement and resistance. American Psychologist, 70(3), 243-54.
Tolman, C. W. (1994). Psychology, society, and subjectivity. An introduction to German critical psychology. London: Routledge.
Tolman, C. W. (1995). The critical psychological view of subject and subjectivity. In C. W. Tolman, F. Cherry, R. van Hezewijk, & I. Lubek. (Eds.), Problems of Theoretical Psychology (pp.40-54). Toronto: Captus University Publications.
Tolman, C. W. (2001). Philosophical doubts about psychology as a natural science. In C. D. Green, M. Shore, & T. Teo (Eds.), The transformation of psychology: Influences of 19th-century philosophy, technology, and natural science (pp.175-193). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Tolman, C. W., & Maiers, W. (Eds.) (1991). Critical psychology: Contributions to an historical science of the subject. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. London: Sage.
Vygotzky, L. S. (1927/1997). The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A methodological investigation. In R. W. Rieber & J. Wollock (Eds.), Problems of the Theory and History of Psychology: Vol.3. The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (pp.233-243). New York: Plenum Press
Wertch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wilkinson, S. (Ed.) (1986). Feminist social psychology: Developing theory and practice. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Ernst SCHRAUBE
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
