lntensity of attack on artificial caterpillars in different Cerrado vegetation types, Brazil
Keywords:
Artificial caterpillars, Cerrado, Habitat Complexity, PredationAbstract
The structural complexity of the habitat influences the patterns of species diversity and the ecological interactions, such as predation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intensity of attackon a model of herbivore insect (artificial caterpillars) in the Cerrado vegetation types with different leveis of structural complexity (campo sujo, campo cerrado, cerrado sensu stricto and semideciduous forest). The sample units consisted of 40 plots of 10x10m distributed among the four types of vegetation mentioned above. ln each plot, 30 artificial caterpillars made of non-toxic clay with similar sizes, shapes and co/ors were placed on vegetation at about 1m high. The number of artificial caterpillars with attack marks was measured after four days of exposure. The difference in the intensity of attack among the types of vegetation was analyzed using Anova followed by Tukey's post-hoc test. The mean intensity of attack was significantly higher in the campo sujo (structurally simplest plant formation of the study) than in other types of vegetation (F3_36=7.85, p=0.0003). Due to being more exposed both visually and chemically in the structurally simpler habitat (less richness and density of woody plants) artificial caterpillars can be more easily located and attacked by predators and parasitoids.
Downloads
References
Aquilino, K.M.; Cardinale, B.J. & lves, A.R. (2005) Reciprocai effects of host plant and natural enemy diversity on herbivore suppression: an empirical study of a model tritrophic system. Oikos, 108(2):275-82.
Corkum, L.D. & Cronin, D.J. (2004). Habitat complexity reduces aggression and enhances consumption in crayfish. Journal of Ethology, 22(1):23-7.
Fáveri, S.B.; Vasconcelos, H.L. & Dirzo, R. (2008). Effects of Amazonian forest fragmentation on the interaction between plants, insect herbivores, and their natural enemies. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 24(1):57-64.
Finke, D.L. & Denno, R.F. (2002). lntraguild predation diminished in complex-structured vegetation: implications for prey suppression. Ecology, 83(3):643-52.
Geitzenauer, H.L. & Bernays, E.A. (1996). Plant effects on prey choice by a vespid wasp, Polistes arizonensis. Ecological Entomology, 21(3):227-34.
Jeffries, M.J. & Lawton, J.H. (1984). Enemy free space and the structure of ecological communities. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 23(4):269-86.
Koh, L.P. & Menge, D.N.L. (2006). Rapid assessment of Lepidoptera predation rates in Neotropical forest fragments. Biotropica, 38(1):132-4.
Lawton, J.H. (1983). Plant architecture and the diversity of phytophagous insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 28(1):23-39.
Loiselle, B.A. & Faqi-Brener, A.G. (2002). What's up? An experimental comparison of predation leveis between canopy and understory in a Tropical Wet Forest. Biotropica, 34(2):327-30.
Nixon, A.E. & Roland, J. (2012). Generalist predation on forest tent caterpillar varies with forest stand composition: an experimental study across multiple life stages. Ecological Entomology, 37(1):13-23.
Posa, M.R.C.; Sodhi, N.S. & Koh, L.P. (2007). Predation on artificial nests and caterpillar models across a disturbance gradient in Subic Bay, Philippines. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 23(1):27-33.
Price, W.P.; Bouton, C.E.; Gross, P.; McPheron, B.A.; Thompson, J.N. & Weis, A.E. (1980). lnteractions among three trophic leveis lnfluence of plants interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 11:41-65.
Riihimaki, J.; Vehvilainen, H.; Kaitaniemi, C. & Koricheva, J. (2006). Host tree architecture mediates the effect of predators on herbivore survival. Eco/ogica/ Entomo!gy, 31(3):227-35.
Sanders, D.; Nickel, H.; Grutzner, T & Platner, C. (2008). Habitat structure mediates top-down effects of spiders and ants on herbivores. Basic and Applied Ecology, 9(2):152-60.
Sih, A.; Crowley, P.; McPeek, M.; Petranka, J. & Strohmeier, K. (1985). Predation, competition, and prey communities: a review of field experiments. Annual Review of Eco/ogy and Systematics, 16:269-311.
Srivastava, D.S. (2006). Habitat structure, trophic structure and ecosystem function: interactive effects in a brome liad-insect community. Oecologia, 149(3):493-504.
Tews, J.; Brose, U.; Grimm, V.; Tielborger, K.; Wichmann, M.C.; Schwager, M., et ai. (2004). Animal speciesdiversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/ diversity: the importance of keystone structures. Journal of Biogeography, 31(31) 79-92
The R Development Core Team. (2010). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Available from: <http://www.R-project.org>. (cited: 2012 Sept. 4)
Thomson, L.J. & Hoffmann, A.A. (2010). Natural enemy responses and pest control: lmportance of local vegetation. Biological Control, 52(2):160-6.
Tvardikova, K. & Novotny, V. (2012). Predation on exposed and leaf-rolling artificial caterpillars in tropical forests of Papua New Guinea.Journal of Tropical Eco!ogy, 28(4):331- 41.
Warfe, D.M. & Barmuta, L.A. (2004). Habitat structural complexity mediates the foraging success of multiple predator species. Oecologia, 141(1):171-8.
