Education to live in the contemporary world: perceptions of students in catholic schools

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24220/2318-0870v26e2021a5325

Palavras-chave:

Catholic school, Contemporary education, High school, Teenager students.

Resumo

This article analyzes part of the data collected in a doctoral research linked to the National University of Rosario, Argentina. The research focused on the place of Catholic schools in the contemporary educational scenario based on the perception of the various actors in education (managers, educators, pastoralists, and students). It intended to problematize the perceptions of High School students about their experience of schooling. One hundred fifty-seven students from six Catholic schools in Belo Horizonte/MG presented their perceptions of school life through a written questionnaire and a drawing. The data were analyzed using Qualitative Epistemology and its concept of subjective meanings. Based on their experience in the Catholic school, the students: evaluate how plastered educational system prevents the development of integral educational processes focused on human development; report the traditionalism that runs through schooling today; demonstrate difficulty in identifying the school’s contribution to their formation and definition of life project; and attribute different meanings to the school education, according to their trajectory in the Catholic school.

Biografia do Autor

Eder D’Artagnan Ferreira Guimarães, Universidad Nacional de Rosario

 Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Facultad de Humanidades y Artes, Programa Posgrado en Ciencias de la Educación. Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina.

Pedro Dabin, Universidad Nacional de Rosario

Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Escuela de Posgrados Programa de Doctorado para Extranjeros, Facultad de Humanidades y Artes. Calle Laprida, 1238, Piso 8-B, Entre Ríos, 2000, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina. Correspondência para/Correspondence to: P. DABIN. E-mail: <prdabin@gmail.com>.

Referências

Aguerrondo, I. Innovación, escuela y sistema educativo: el reto de la articulación entre niveles. In: Gvirtz, S.; Podestá, M. E.; Aguerrondo, I. Mejorar la gestión directiva en la escuela. Buenos Aires: Granica, 2017. p. 91-111.

Arias Valencia, M. M. La triangulación metodológica: sus principios, alcances y limitaciones. Revista Investigación y Educación en Enfermería, v. 18, n. 1, p. 13-26, 2000. Available from: https://pt.scribd.com/document/56428920/Arias-MM-La-triangulacion-metodologica-1-Sus-principios-alcances-y-limitaciones. Cited: Mar. 31, 2021.

Beard, A. Natural born learners: our incredible capacity to learn and how we can harness it. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 2018.

Cea D’Ancona, M. A. Metodologia cuantitativa: estrategias y técnicas de investigación social. Madrid: Síntesis, 1996.

Dubet, F.; Martuccelli, D. En la escuela: sociología de la experiencia escolar. Buenos Aires: Losada, 1998.

Flick, U. Introdução à pesquisa qualitativa. 3. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2009.

Freire, P. Pedagogia da autonomia. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 2011.

Freire, P. Por uma pedagogia da pergunta. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 2014.

González Rey, F. Pesquisa qualitativa e subjetividade: os processos de construção da informação. São Paulo: Pioneira Thomson Learning, 2005.

González Rey, F.; Martínez, A. M. Subjetividade: teoria, epistemologia e método. Campinas: Editora Alínea, 2017.

Klein, A. M.; Arantes, V. A. Projetos de vida de jovens estudantes do Ensino Médio e a escola. Educação & Realidade, v. 41, n. 1, p. 135-154, 2016.

Natividade, M. R.; Coutinho, M. C.; Zanella, A. V. Desenho na pesquisa com crianças: análise na perspectiva histórico-cultural. Contextos Clínicos, v. 1, n. 1, p. 9-18, 2008.

Rascovan, S. E. Los caminos de la vida. In: Korinfeld, D.; Levy, D.; Rascovan, S. E. Adolescentes y adultos en la escuela: puntuaciones de época. Buenos Aires: Paidós, 2016. p. 241-267.

Rivas, A. ¿Qué hay que aprender hoy? De la escuela de las respuestas a la escuela de las preguntas. España: Fundación Santillana, 2019.

Romero, C. La institución escolar en la sociedad del conocimiento. In: Gvirtz, S.; Podestá, M. E.; Aguerrondo, I. Mejorar la gestión directiva en la escuela. Buenos Aires: Granica, 2017. p. 131-157.

Samaja, J. La triangulación metodológica (Pasos para una comprensión dialéctica de la combinación de métodos). In: II Taller Latinoamericano de Medicina Social, 1992, Caracas. Anales […]. Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela, 1992. p. 27-39.

Sautu, R. et al. La construcción del marco teórico en la investigación social. In: Dalle, P. et al. Manual de metodología: construcción del marco teórico, formulación de los objetivos y elección de la metodología. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2005. p. 29-81.

Serdyukov, P. Innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, v. 10, n. 1, p. 4-33, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Rethinking Education: towards a global common good? Paris: UNESCO, 2015.

Van Velzen, W. et al. Making school improvement work: a conceptual guide to practice. Leuven: ACCO, 1985.

Vasilachis de Gialdino, I. Métodos cualitativos I: los problemas teórico-metodológicos. Buenos Aires: ECEGraph, 1992.

Vygotsky, L. S. The psychology of art. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995. Available from: https://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/ works/1925/art11.htm. Cited: Mar. 31,2021.

Downloads

Publicado

19-11-2021